Lebanon: a re-emerging Middle Eastern secrecy jurisdiction
Lebanon is ranked at seventh position on the 2013 Financial Secrecy Index with 79 secrecy points out of a potential 100, which places it near the top end of the secrecy scale.
The earliest roots of Lebanon’s status as an offshore financial centre date back a century or so. Between the First and Second World Wars, many Lebanese emigrated to parts of the developing world, particularly to Latin America and to Africa, especially to French African colonies. This disparate group soon began to develop as a classic successful trading diaspora, initially operating as middlemen beneath colonial Europeans in the trading hierarchy, but above indigenous locals – and then, amid decolonisation, becoming increasingly powerful in many economies, tapping the diaspora’s large international trading networks, and expanding into diamond mining and many other sectors. These international networks remain substantially in place today and are a ‘patriotic’ cornerstone of Lebanon’s surprisingly resilient offshore banking sector.
Lebanon itself first became a trading nation of note following the creation of Israel in 1948, which saw Beirut supplant Israel’s commercial port of Haifa as the commercial centre of the Middle East. According to financial historian Tom Naylor (p34), the subsequent Suez crisis of 1956 boosted Beirut, helping it displace Cairo as the beachhead for European business into that region of the Middle East. That same year, Lebanon created its banking secrecy law, a major factor that helped cement Lebanon’s role as a secrecy jurisdiction. During that period, and afterwards, Beirut sought to position itself as a commercial and financial entrepôt for the region, much as Dubai has done more recently. As one account puts it, Lebanon
But by the time of the OPEC oil embargoes of the 1970s and the gigantic ensuing financial windfalls into Arab treasuries, Lebanon was well established as a financial centre for the region – and it was so successfully ring-fenced against domestic turmoil that deposits reportedly doubled between 1975 and 1980 – an astonishing feat given that Lebanon was in the grip of civil war during the period. The fact that Lebanon has a history of setting its banks up with large capital buffers – itself probably due to the history of political turmoil – is also a major factor in preventing the flight of deposits.
The civil war lasted until 1991 and although there was some eventual damage to the financial sector, it rebounded again quickly in the 1990s, helped not only by the fact that Lebanon did not default on its debts during the war, but also by the constant flow of remittances from the powerful Lebanese diaspora which, at 21 percent of GDP in 2007, is among the highest rates in the world (pp4-5). The banking system largely shrugged off the global financial crisis of 2008 onwards, with deposit inflows continuing to grow at 20 percent annually.
Lebanon's offshore centre today
Nearly half a century after the introduction of Lebanon’s banking secrecy law, secrecy remains an important pillar of Lebanon’s financial centre today. While there is some exaggeration in one offshore practitioner’s boast that Lebanon’s banking secrecy is “the strongest in the world,” it does offer a range of secrecy facilities, and its secrecy score of 79 is very high indeed.
Although official statistics suggest that non-residents account for only a small share of Lebanese deposits, this classification is not taken seriously[ii], and the IMF notes that
It adds that:
“Anecdotal evidence from local banks suggests that the Lebanese Diaspora (most of whom have a Lebanese address) is the largest group of depositors. This Diaspora includes a significant share of high net worth individuals, many doing business in countries with underdeveloped banking systems. Depositors from other Arab countries reportedly hail mostly from Syria, West Bank and Gaza, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE.”
Most astonishingly, it adds that while Lebanon’s population is four million, the Lebanese Diaspora is estimated at anywhere between 5 million and 16 million-strong; the World Bank estimated these remittances at $7.6 billion annually in 2010-2012. Many members of the Lebanese diaspora are high-net worth individuals and they include the Lebanese-Mexican telecoms tycoon Carlos Slim, the world’s richest man, as well as Carlos Ghosn, the French-Lebanese-Brazilian boss of carmakers Renault and Nissan. Nicholas Hayek, a Swiss-Lebanese, runs Swatch, the biggest maker of Swiss watches.
The role of the diaspora makes Lebanon a very particular kind of offshore financial centre.
. . .
Lebanese expatriates in Africa and South America have established financial systems outside the formal financial sector, and some are reportedly involved in TBML [trade-based money laundering] schemes. Lebanese diamond brokers and purchasing agents are reportedly part of an international network of traders who participate in underground activities including the trafficking of conflict diamonds, diamond trade fraud (circumventing the Kimberly process) and TBML.”
Lebanon has taken some very limited steps to come into line with international standards on transparency: it created a new money-laundering law in 2001, the year of the major terrorist attacks on the United States; and in 2011 it imposed certain new restrictions on banks related to terrorist financing and money laundering, reportedly with a view to mitigating “reputational risk to which banks and financial institutions might be exposed and to protecting the utmost national interest.”
However, a 2012 report on Lebanon by the OECD Global Forum points to a litany of serious shortcomings. It noted:
“Lebanese authorities do not have access to information held by banks, fiduciary institutions and other institutions within the financial industry, for tax purposes. Although the Lebanese competent authority can exchange any information already in its possession, it is unclear whether it has powers to access information for exchange purposes when the information is not required for it has own tax purposes.
. . .
Due to strict bank secrecy obligations, the Ministry [of Finance] cannot access information regarding transactions and the identity of customers of banks and other entities within the financial sector, including fiduciaries under a Lebanese fiduciary contract. Moreover, the scope of the professional secrecy safeguards appears to be broader than the professional secrecy protected under the international standard."
. . .
Bearer shares and to-order shares may be issued by joint stock companies and partnerships limited by shares, and adequate mechanisms to ensure that the owners of such shares can be identified are not in place. Lebanese law does not ensure that information identifying the settlors, trustees and beneficiaries of foreign trusts with a Lebanese trustee is available, in particular when the trustees is acting outside the financial industry and thus not subject to AML obligations."